A Technique of Occipitocervical Arthrodesis in Children Using Autologous Rib Grafts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Description of an operative technique with an illustrative case report. OBJECTIVES: The technique is presented to provide an alternative to iliac crest graft procedures for achieving occipitocervical fusion in children. This technique is particularly useful in children with instability after extensive decompression or laminectomy and in children with a large protuberant occiput. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The majority of techniques previously described for occipitocervical fusion in children rely on corticocancellous iliac crest autograft. Results generally have been promising; however, it can be difficult to harvest enough graft to span large defects after extensive decompression or to contour an iliac crest graft to a protuberant occiput. Structural rib autograft is superior in terms of availability and its unique and modifiable contour. Theoretical benefits of rib graft include superior strength and lower donor site morbidity. METHODS: The surgical technique is described. A case of a 2-year-old boy with Down's syndrome and myelopathy secondary to cervical instability is reviewed. RESULTS: The patient underwent occipitocervical arthrodesis using the technique described. The child made a full neurologic recovery, and at the 2-years follow-up evaluation, the graft had incorporated and the spine was stable. CONCLUSION: A technique of occipitocervical arthrodesis in children is described using autologous rib graft. This procedure was designed to span large defects or to deal with a large protuberant occiput; however, it is also useful for less demanding cases and may offer several advantages compared with procedures relying on iliac crest graft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".