MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987109337 · doi:10.1094/pd-90-1262a

First Report of the Purple Variant of <i>Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens</i> pv. <i>flaccumfaciens</i>, Causal Agent of Bacterial Wilt of Bean, in Canada

2006· article· en· W1987109337 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hsiao‐Wen Huang, R. S. Erickson, L. J. Yanke, Cheryl D. Chelle, H.‐H. Mündel

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBacterial wiltPhaseolusOrange (colour)BotanyHorticulturePigmentNutrient agarCropBacteriaAgarChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacterial wilt of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) caused by the yellow and orange variants of Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. Flaccumfaciens (Hedges) Collins & Jones was found in western Canada in 2002 (1). A purple variant was found in a pooled sample of discolored cull seeds of great northern bean (cv. US1140) from a crop grown near Bow Island, Alberta, Canada in 2005. Bacterial colonies isolated from purple seed using modified Burkholder's agar (MBA) (3) were convex, glistening, and smooth edged with blue pigment diffusing into the medium. Three isolates (V154, V155, and V254) were identified with conventional tests (2), carbohydrate oxidation (GP Microplates, Biolog Inc., Hayward, CA), and cellular fatty acids (CFA) (MIDI, Inc., Newark, DE). All were grampositive, motile, aerobic rods with yellow colonies producing extracellular blue pigment on MBA when grown at 20 ± 2°C. Bacterial isolates grew at 27°C but grew weakly at 37°C. They were positive for catalase and hydrolysis of hippurate and indoxyl acetate and negative for urease, gelatin liquification, and oxidase. CFA profiles were approximately 48% 15:0 anteiso, 40% 17:0 anteiso, 7% 16:0 iso, and 3% 15:0 iso; with 17:1 anteiso A variable but <1%. Many carbohydrates were oxidized in the Biolog microplates with little acid production. The results match C. flaccumfaciens (2) and the MIDI and Biolog databases, as well as the purple variant of C. flaccumfaciens found in Nebraska, the only previous report of this variant (4). The pathogenicity of the three isolates was tested. Seeds of great northern (cv. US1140) and navy (cv. Morden003) beans were soaked in a bacterial suspension (1 × 108 CFU/ml) or distilled water (control) for 1 h, planted in Cornell mix in root trainers, incubated at 28/22°C (16-h day/8-h night) in a growth cabinet for 14 days, and examined for seedling wilt. The test had three replicates per treatment and 20 seeds per replicate in a completely randomized design. All three isolates were pathogenic to both bean cultivars. The wilt incidences were 51, 57, and 56% on US1140 and 64, 76, and 69% on Morden003 for isolates V154, V155, and V254, respectively. The purple variant of C. flaccumfaciens was reisolated from hypocotyls of wilted seedlings but not from healthy controls. The experiment was repeated using the reisolated bacteria and the results were similar to the first experiment, thus fulfilling Koch's postulates. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the purple variant of C. flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens in Canada. References: (1) T. F. Hsieh et al. Plant Dis. 86:1275, 2002. (2) K. Komagata et al. Page 1313 in: Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Vol. 2. Williams and Wilkens, Baltimore, MD, 1986. (3) G. A. Nelson and G. Semeniuk. Phytopathology 54:330, 1964. (4) M. L. Schuster et al. Can. J. Microbiol. 14:423, 1968.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207