MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1987121748 · doi:10.1167/8.6.812

Application of reverse correlation to the study of visual and extraretinal signals in the macaque superior colliculus

2010· article· en· W1987121748 on OpenAlexaff
Chan‐Gi Pack, Jan Churan, Daniel Guitton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceptive fieldSaccadic maskingSaccadeSuperior colliculusMacaqueSaccadic suppression of image displacementEye movementStimulus (psychology)Superior ColliculiFixation (population genetics)NeuroscienceVisual systemComputer visionArtificial intelligencePsychologyVisual cortexComputer sciencePopulationCognitive psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reverse correlation method has often been used to map the spatiotemporal receptive fields of visual neurons. For many visual neurons, the receptive fields are also modulated by extraretinal signals, including those related to attention, arousal, and eye movements. We have therefore adapted the reverse correlation method to characterize visual receptive fields in the context of saccadic eye movements. The technique was used to study neurons in the macaque superior colliculus, where pre-saccadic changes in the size and position of visual receptive fields have been reported previously (Wurtz and Mohler, 1976; Walker et al. 1995). Our stimulus was a sparse pattern of randomly-positioned black and white spots, presented against a gray background. The black and white spots occupied 2–5% of the display, and their positions were changed randomly at a frame rate of 85Hz. We mapped the receptive fields of neurons in the superficial and intermediate layers of the superior colliculus in one monkey during fixation as well as during visually guided saccades. We found that pooling over 700 to 1000 saccades provided in most cases a signal of sufficient strength to study pre-saccadic changes in receptive fields with a temporal resolution of around 50ms. In data from 85 neurons we found that many receptive fields changed their characteristics beginning about 100ms before saccades. In most cases an overall reduction of activity was observed, similar to the perceptual suppression of vision that occurs around the time of a saccade. Surprisingly, we did not observe any changes in receptive field position, even though such receptive field shifts are known to occur in the superior colliculus (Walker et al. 1995). We are currently probing this paradox to better delineate the advantages and disadvantages of reverse correlation for characterizing the interaction of extraretinal and visual signals in single neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vision→Same topicVisual perception and processing mechanisms→French-language works237,207→