Use of Omeprazole as a CYP3A Probe Drug: Effect of Sex and Menstrual Cycle Phase on CYP3A Activity in Healthy Caucasian Adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To determine the effects of sex and menstrual cycle phase on CYP3A activity and to characterize the intraindividual variability of CYP3A, 24 Caucasian adults were given a single dose of omeprazole every 14th day for 3 months (men) or during the mid-follicular and mid-luteal phases over 3 full menstrual cycles (women). The 2-hour plasma metabolic ratio (MR) (omeprazole/omeprazole sulphone) was used as a measure of CYP3A activity. Overall mean MRs for men (2.4 +/- 1.2) and women (2.3 +/- 0.93) were not significantly different. In women, no difference in mean omeprazole MR was observed between the mid-follicular phase (2.2 +/- 0.85) and mid-luteal phase (2.4 +/- 1.0). When all data in the mid-luteal phase were stratified into 3 groups based on the progesterone concentrations (>50 nM [A], 20-50 nM [B], and <20 nM [C]), the MR of group A was significantly lower than that of B and C. The MRs of women during the mid-luteal phase were weakly correlated with progesterone concentrations (r = -0.35; P = .03). Individual coefficients of variation (CV%) in MR ranged from 8.7% to 60.2%, with a median 30.0%. No sex or menstrual cycle differences in CYP3A activity as measured by the probe drug omeprazole were seen. Higher CYP3A activity in women may be associated with higher endogenous progesterone concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".