Construction of<i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i>wild-type S76 and Cry<sup>–</sup>derivatives expressing a green fluorescent protein: two potential marker organisms to study bacteria–plant interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collectively, the species Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus anthracis represent microorganisms of high economic, medical, and biodefense importance. Although the genetic correlation and pathogenic characteristics have been extensively dissected, the ecological properties of these three species in their natural environments remain poorly understood. Thus, a tractable marker for detecting these bacteria under specific environmental and physiological conditions is a valuable tool. With this purpose, a plasmid (pAD43-25) carrying a functional gfp gene sequence (gfpmut3A) was introduced into the wild-type strain Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki S76, which bears approximately 11 plasmids, allowing constitutive synthesis of green fluorescent protein (GFP) during vegetative growth (strain S76GFP+). Additionally, this vector was transferred to a plasmid-cured (Cry-) B. thuringiensis host. Bright green cells were detected by fluorescence microscopy in both recombinants by 2 h after inoculation in liquid medium and could be seen throughout the remaining cultivation time until complete sporulation was accomplished. For strain S76GFP+ protein profile and plasmid DNA analyses indicate, respectively, that this recombinant maintained Cry proteins expression and resident plasmid outline. Thus, in addition to the potential of strain S76GFP+ as a marker organism in bacteria--plant interaction studies, the production and stability of active GFPmut3a make this unique expression system a useful experimental model to study adaptive changes of host-plasmid as well as plasmid-plasmid relationships in a population of cells stressed by the production of a recombinant protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".