MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987242675 · doi:10.1159/000123961

Effect of Oral Melatonin Administration on Melatonin, 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid, Indoleacetic Acid, and Cyclic Nucleotides in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid

2008· article· en· W1987242675 on OpenAlexafffund
Simon N. Young, Serge Gauthier, Maureen E. Kiely, Samarthji Lal, Gregory M. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMontreal General HospitalDouglas Mental Health University InstituteDouglas CollegeMcGill University
FundersMedical Research CouncilMcGill University
KeywordsMelatoninInternal medicineCerebrospinal fluidEndocrinology5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acidPineal glandTryptaminePinealectomyChemistryMedicineSerotoninBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Melatonin was given orally to patients undergoing diagnostic pneumoencephalography and various compounds were measured in the lumbar and cisternal CSF. Melatonin markedly increased plasma and CSF melatonin concentrations. The plasma: CSF melatonin ratios were similar in patients who received, and in those who did not receive, melatonin. This supports the idea that melatonin is released from pineal to blood and gets into the CSF via the blood. Melatonin did not affect CSF 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, which indicates that it has no effect on 5-hydroxytryptamine metabolism. Melatonin increased CSF indoleacetic acid significantly, indicating increased metabolism of tryptamine. Melatonin did not affect CSF cAMP levels, but increased cGMP levels. The effect on indoleacetic acid and cGMP was seen in both lumbar and cisternal CSF, suggesting that melatonin can have generalized actions throughout the CNS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207