Geographic and Temporal Distribution of Mortality Rates for Multiple Sclerosis in Canada, 1965–1994
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Statistics Canada data were used to calculate multiple sclerosis (MS) mortality rates per 100,000 population in the Canadian provinces from 1965 to 1994. For the period 1965-1994, the highest average annual MS mortality rates were in Quebec (4.4) and Ontario (3.9), while the Western Provinces had an intermediate rate (2.1) and the Atlantic Provinces had the lowest rate (1.2). Female mortality rates exceeded male rates in each of the four regions. Average annual MS mortality rates in Canada overall fluctuated during the past 30 years, with rates of 3.4 in 1965-1969, 4.2 in 1970-1974, 3.2 in 1975-1979, 2.3 in 1980-1984, 2.8 in 1985-1989 and 3.9 in 1990-1994. Female mortality rates exceeded male rates during each 5-year period. The highest mortality rates for both genders were in the 65 years plus age group. Rates in the under 45 years age group have remained stable, while rates in both the 45-64 and 65 years plus age groups have fluctuated. There is no apparent relationship between prevalence and mortality rates among the Canadian provinces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".