MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987304025 · doi:10.1186/1897-4287-9-s1-p40

Risks of cancers for carriers of monoallelic MUTYH mutation with a family history of colorectal cancer

2011· article· en· W1987304025 on OpenAlexaff
Aung Ko Win, Sean P. Cleary, James G. Dowty, Noralane M. Lindor, Polly A. Newcomb, Robert W. Haile, Joanne Young, Daniel D. Buchanan, Loı̈c Le Marchand, Roger Green, John L. Hopper, Steven Gallinger, Mark A. Jenkins

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteCancer Care OntarioMount Sinai Hospital
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineMUTYHColorectal cancerPopulationCancerGermline mutationInternal medicineOncologyIncidence (geometry)Family historyLynch syndromeEndometrial cancerGynecologyMutationGeneticsDNA mismatch repairBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Several studies have shown an increased risk of colorectal and extracolonic cancers for carriers of germline MUTYH mutations inherited from both parents (biallelic mutations). Extracolonic cancer risks for carriers of a MUTYH mutation inherited from only one parent (monoallelic mutation) have not previously been estimated. Materials and methods We identified 144 families of MUTYH mutation carriers from three countries that we ascertained through population-based sources of the multi-site, international Colon Cancer Family Registry. Mutation status, sex, age, and histories of cancer, polypectomy, and hysterectomy were sought from 2,179 of their relatives. Using Cox regression weighted to adjust for the method of ascertainment, we estimated the country-, age- and sex-specific standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of colorectal and extracolonic cancers for monoallelic mutation carriers, compared with the general population, and corresponding age-specific cumulative risks. Results Monoallelic mutation carriers with a family history of CRC had a significantly increased incidence of CRC (SIR = 2.04; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.56 – 2.70; P <0.001), gastric cancer (SIR = 3.24; 95% CI = 2.18 – 4.98; P <0.001), and endometrial cancer (SIR = 2.23; 95% CI = 1.13 – 4.86; P = 0.03) and a marginal increased incidence of liver cancer (SIR = 3.09; 95% CI = 1.07 – 12.25; P = 0.07) compared to the general population. The estimated cumulative risks to age 70 years based on the population cancer incidence of the United States were as follows: for CRC, 6% (95% CI = 5 – %) for men and 4% (95% CI = 3 – 6%) for women; for gastric cancer, 2% (95% CI = 1 – 3%) for men and 0.7% (95% CI = 0.5 – 1%) for women; for liver cancer, 1% (95% CI = 0.3 – 3%) for men and 0.3% (95% CI = 0.1 – 1%) for women; and for endometrial cancer, 4% (95% CI = 2 – 8%). There was no evidence of increased risks for cancer of the brain, pancreas, kidney, lung, breast or prostate. Conclusion

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHereditary Cancer in Clinical PracticeSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207