MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987318143 · doi:10.14740/ijcp194w

GJB2 Gene Testing, Etiologic Diagnosis and Genetic Counseling in Romanian Persons With Prelingual Hearing Loss

2015· article· en· W1987318143 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cristina Dragomir, Adriana Stan, Dragos T. Stefanescu, Codruţ Sarafoleanu, Emilia Severin, Lorand Savu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical Pediatrics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomanianMedicineHearing lossAudiologyGenetic testingGenetic counselingGeneticsLinguisticsInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Nowadays, molecular genetic tests provide insights into the etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss (HL). Specific gene mutations are known to cause sensorineural HL of early onset. Previously published studies showed the allelic heterogeneity of GJB2 gene as main genetic cause of isolated congenital HL. The aims of the present study were to provide an extended and updated spectrum of mutations in GJB2 gene and to identify the most prevalent mutations in the Romanian population for testing prevention strategy in people with sensorineural HL of early onset. Methods: To overcome our aims, we used clinical data from 125 unrelated persons with congenital HL and performed ARMS-PCR and DNA sequencing techniques for detection of known mutations or identification of mutations within GJB2 gene. Results: The most prevalent mutation was c.35delG found in both homozygotic and heterozygotic forms. The second mutant allele was c.71G>A (p.W24X) found in homo- or heterozygotic forms as well, followed by c.-23+1G>A and c.380G>A (p.R127H) mutations with lower frequencies. Conclusion: The study reveals the c.35delG mutation as having the highest prevalence, further highlights the genetic background of congenital HL in a local population, and supports improvement of genetic testing such as newborn and carrier screening on which to base genetic counseling services. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2015;4(1):121-126 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/ijcp194w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.196
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical PediatricsSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207