Lysosome Dispersion in Osteoblasts Accommodates Enhanced Collagen Production during Differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lysosomes are essential organelles for intracellular degradation and are generally sequestered near the cell center to receive vesicles with contents targeted for destruction. During ascorbic acid (AA)-induced differentiation of osteogenic cells ( Beck, G. R., Jr., Zerler, B., and Moran, E. (2001) Cell Growth Differ. 12, 61-83 ), we saw a marked increase in total lysosome organelles in osteoblastic cells, in addition to an enhanced endocytic rate. Interestingly, lysosomes were dispersed toward the cell periphery in differentiating osteoblasts. We determined that lysosome dispersion in differentiated osteoblasts required intact microtubules for long range transport and was dependent on kinesin motors but did not involve cytosolic acidification. Impairment of lysosome dispersion markedly reduced AA-induced osteoblast differentiation. Lysosomes were not secreted in differentiated osteoblasts, implicating them instead in intracellular degradation. We assayed the degradative capacity and saw a significant increase in DQ-ovalbumin fluorescence in differentiated osteogenic cells compared with undifferentiated control cells. Osteogenic cells are specialized for type I collagen production, and we noted enhanced secreted and intracellular collagen in AA-differentiated osteoblasts versus control cells. Importantly, osteoblasts displayed procollagen-containing vesicles that were distributed throughout the cytoplasm, a portion of which colocalized with lysosomes. Treatment of cells with 2,2'-dipyridyl to inhibit procollagen trimerization enhanced colocalization of lysosomes with procollagen-containing organelles, implicating dispersed lysosomes in collagen processing in osteogenic cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".