Monoamine oxidase inhibition and neuroprotection by N<sup>1</sup>‐propargylphenelzine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The ability of N 1 ‐propargylphenelzine and related N 1 ‐propargylhydrazines to inhibit monoamine oxidase‐A (MAO‐A) and ‐B (MAO‐B) and to prevent N‐(2‐chloroethyl)‐N‐ethyl‐2‐bromobenzylamine (DSP‐4)‐induced noradrenergic neurotoxicity was examined. N 1 ‐Propargylphenelzine strongly inhibited MAO‐A and MAO‐B in in vitro assays using rat brain or liver as the enzyme source. In ex vivo studies in rats, both intraperitoneal and oral administration of N 1 ‐propargylphenelzine strongly inhibited brain and liver MAO‐A and MAO‐B. The extent of ex vivo MAO inhibition and increased levels of noradrenaline and 5‐hydroxytryptamine by N 1 ‐propargylphenelzine was comparable to that of phenelzine. Unlike phenelzine, however, N 1 ‐propargylphenelzine did not elevate γ‐aminobutryic acid (GABA) concentrations in rat brain. A single intraperitoneal administration of N 1 ‐propargylphenelzine to mice, 1 week prior to sacrifice, reduced DSP‐4‐induced depletion of noradrenaline in the hippocampus. The brains of N 1 ‐propargylphenelzine‐treated mice from the DSP‐4 neurotoxicity experiments had normal MAO‐B activity, but MAO‐A was significantly inhibited; this was in contrast to animals that had received (–)‐deprenyl, who showed normal MAO‐A activity but a decrease of MAO‐B. The present results indicate that N 1 ‐propargylphenelzine may be a useful neuroprotective compound with a long‐term in vivo propensity to inhibit MAO‐A. Drug Dev. Res. 53:15–21, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".