The Screening Tool for Autism in Two Year Olds can identify children at risk of autism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stone WL, Coonrod EE, Turner LM, et al . Psychometric properties of the STAT for early autism screening. J Autism Dev Disord 2004;34:691–701.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] Q How accurate is the Screening Tool for Autism in Two Year Olds (STAT) for identifying children at risk of autism? ### ![Graphic][5]</img>Design: Diagnostic cohort study. ### ![Graphic][6]</img>Setting: University based diagnostic evaluation centre and affiliated speech and hearing centre, Tennessee, USA; 1997 to 2001. ### ![Graphic][7]</img>Patients: Initial validation of the STAT was carried out in 13 matched pairs of children aged 24–35 months, with a diagnosis of autism or alternatively developmental delay, language impairment, or both (DD/LI), and without severe sensory or motor impairment. Further validation was carried out in a sample of 104 children selected on the basis of parental report of developmental concerns. ### ![Graphic][8]</img>Test: The STAT consists of 12 interactive items assessing different behavioural domains, including play, requesting, directing attention, and motor imitation. The test was administered by trained examiners who were blinded to the children’s diagnoses. Overall score ranges from 0 to 4, with lower … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJournal%2Bof%2Bautism%2Band%2Bdevelopmental%2Bdisorders%26rft.stitle%253DJ%2BAutism%2BDev%2BDisord%26rft.aulast%253DStone%26rft.auinit1%253DW.%2BL.%26rft.volume%253D34%26rft.issue%253D6%26rft.spage%253D691%26rft.epage%253D701%26rft.atitle%253DPsychometric%2Bproperties%2Bof%2Bthe%2BSTAT%2Bfor%2Bearly%2Bautism%2Bscreening.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1007%252Fs10803-004-5289-8%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F15679188%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10803-004-5289-8&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=15679188&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F8%2F3%2F69.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000225619900010&link_type=ISI [5]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [6]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [7]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif [8]: /embed/inline-graphic-4.gif
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it