MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Symptom Reporting by Functional Dyspeptics During the Water Load Test

2005· article· en· W1987391262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lorrie Roth, Michael D. Crowell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSomatizationBloatingAlexithymiaDepression (economics)DistressInternal medicineToronto Alexithymia ScaleNauseaGastroenterologyPsychiatryAnxietyPhysical therapyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Reporting of symptoms and visceral sensations in functional dyspepsia is subjective and influenced by such factors as somatization and depression. To better understand the role of these factors in symptom reporting, somatization, somatosensory amplification, alexithymia, and depression were evaluated in patients with functional dyspepsia undergoing a water load test. METHODS: Sixty-seven controls and 103 patients with functional dyspepsia underwent a 5-min water load. Participants both recalled dyspeptic symptoms from the previous 2 wk and rated symptoms of nausea, fullness, and bloating during water load. Participants also completed the symptom checklist-90-R, somatosensory amplification scale, and the Toronto alexithymia scale. RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients with dyspepsia had greater psychiatric distress and higher scores for somatosensory amplification and alexithymia. Patients with dyspepsia also reported fullness at significantly lower volumes of water and experienced greater symptoms during water load than controls. Receiver operator characteristics of water load volume and provoked symptoms suggested that water load (WL) volume was a better discriminator of patients with dyspepsia from controls. Patients with dyspepsia recalled significantly more symptoms in the 2 wk prior to study. Symptoms provoked during WL were not associated with measured psychiatric constructs in either controls or patients with dyspepsia whereas recalled symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia were significantly associated with several measured psychiatric constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with functional dyspepsia report fullness at lower volumes of ingested water and develop more symptoms than do controls. Water load volume better discriminates patients with dyspepsia from controls than does symptoms provoked during water load. Provoked symptoms in dyspepsia are not associated with measured psychiatric constructs but recalled symptoms are.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207