MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987394762 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.015

Enhancement factor and kinetics of CO2 capture by MEA-methanol hybrid solvents

2009· article· en· W1987394762 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethanolChemistrySolventAqueous solutionReaction rate constantSolubilityInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryKinetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although many studies have been done towards the solubility, enhancement factor and kinetic of the reaction between CO 2 and various alkanolamines, the reaction media are limited to aqueous solutions. This research focuses on study above characteristics of monoethanolamine (MEA)-methanol hybrid solvent. The objective of this research is to understand how the methanol mixed into MEA solution can enhance the CO 2 absorption. Three solvents used in this study are MEA aqueous solution, MEA in water-methanol 1:1 by volume, and MEA in methanol. The solubility of studied solvents was compared by Henry’s constant of pure solvent. The Kirkwood-Buff formalism was used to derive the Henry’s constant of CO 2 in water-methanol mixture. The bench-scale of CO 2 absorption in DX structuring column was carried out to evaluate the enhancement factor based on the film theory model. Based on zwitterions mechanism, reaction rate constant of the deprotonation step in MEA aqueous solution is the highest followed by MEA in methanol-water and MEA in methanol respectively, while the reaction rate constant of the formation step is in the reversed order. First order of reaction with respect to carbon dioxide is found for every representative solvent. The order of reaction respect to MEA ranges from 1.19 to 1.67 depending on the ratio of methanol in the solution. The reaction order is increased in the order of water, methanol-water and methanol. The result showed that higher performance of CO 2 absorption by MEA-methanol hybrid solvent is not because of improvement of kinetic reaction. On the contrary, methanol mixed in to MEA solution reduces the kinetic rate in the deprotronation step and cause the reduction of enhancement factor. It is because of the methanol mixed into MEA hybrid solvent enhances the diffusivity and solubility characteristics of the solvent that increase the CO 2 absorption rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it