Electrochemical Oxidation of Chlortetracycline Using Ti/IrO2 and Ti/PbO2 Anode Electrodes: Application of Experimental Design Methodology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The degradation of chlortetracycline hydrochloride in aqueous medium (initial concentration of 10 mg/L) has been studied by electrooxidation process using Ti/PbO2 and Ti/IrO2 anode electrodes. The performance of the electrolytic cell resulted from its capability of reacting on pollutants by using both effects of electrolysis. Indeed, the organic pollutants can be destroyed at the electrode surface where hydroxyl radicals are generated (direct effect), and they can be simultaneously oxidized in solution by means of active chlorine (indirect effect). Different operating parameters, such as current density, reaction time, and temperature, were investigated. The optimal experimental parameters for chlortetracycline degradation have been investigated by using a central composite design (CCD) methodology. It has been demonstrated that under the optimal conditions determined by this method, electrooxidation can economically be applied to oxidize chlortetracycline (96% of degradation for a total cost of US$3.23 per gram of chlortetracycline removed).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it