MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987488108 · doi:10.2118/0406-0105-jpt

Clair Field, West of Shetland

2006· article· en· W1987488108 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Bybee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShetlandOil fieldOil productionPetroleumNorth seaNatural gas fieldGeologyPetroleum engineeringOceanographyEngineeringPaleontologyWaste managementNatural gas

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by Assistant Technology Editor Karen Bybee, contains highlights of paper SPE 97772, "Unlocking the Potential: A North Sea Heavy Oil Success Story," by J.J. Wylde, SPE, and G.D.M. Williams, SPE, Clariant Oil Services, and R.E. Cousins, BP plc, prepared for the 2005 SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, 1–3 November. The full-length paper details one of the newest producing fields in the North Sea, the West of Shetland development. Prestartup design and implementation challenges are described, as well as commissioning philosophy for the plant and chemical-injection facilities. Most of the full-length paper focuses on the first 6 months of production history, production-technology management, and how actual operation differed from the planned and designed specifications. Clair Field Background The Clair field is 40 miles west of the Shetland Islands and currently is produced from a single fixed platform in 460 ft of water. The field produces both oil and gas. The field produces 20°API crude with a 550 scf/bbl gas/oil ratio. The Clair reservoir extends over a 25×12.5-mile area in complex Devonian and Carboniferous units covering five license blocks. Current estimates of likely oil exceed 4 billion STB original oil in place (OOIP), making Clair the largest undeveloped hydrocarbon accumulation on the U.K. continental shelf and a key component of future U.K. production stategy. The Clair field was discovered in 1977. In the early 1990s, 3D-seismic data were acquired over the whole field, and two wells were drilled in 1991 and 1992. Although demonstrating commercial flow rates, the wells were not produced for sufficiently long to provide confidence in long-term reservoir performance. In 1996, an extended performance test was conducted on Well 206/8-10z in the core area. Flowing at an average rate of 10,000 B/D for 23 days, with a 18.5-B/D peak, the well performance changed the perception of the Clair reservoir by demonstrating sustainable crude-oil delivery. Because of its extent, the Clair field is to be produced as a phased development. The first phase builds on the successful 1996 well test and targets development of the Core, Graben, and Horst areas. The reservoir is divided into nine fault-bounded segments having a common free-water level and 1,969-ft maximum oil column. A gas cap is present in the structurally elevated ridge segments. The reservoir depth is 6,070 ft true vertical depth subsurface, and initial reservoir pressure was 2,736 psi with a 151°F temperature. Work is continuing to define this first development. The challenge for Clair is understanding the issues of reservoir deliverability, well productivity, and managing the cost base while achieving a sustainable development. Clair will be the third West of Shetland development, following Foinaven and Schiehallion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207