MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ethnic variation in CYP2A6 and association of genetically slow nicotine metabolism and smoking in adult Caucasians

2004· article· en· W1987502189 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kerri A. Schoedel, Ewa Hoffmann, Yushu Rao, Edward M. Sellers, Rachel F. Tyndale

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacogenetics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of New BrunswickCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCYP2A6NicotineEthnic groupGeneticsGenetic variationPharmacogeneticsBiologyVariation (astronomy)GenotypeGeneSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genetically variable CYP2A6 is the primary enzyme that inactivates nicotine to cotinine. Our objective was to investigate allele frequencies among five ethnic groups and to investigate the relationship between genetically slow nicotine metabolic inactivation and smoking status, cigarette consumption, age of first smoking and duration of smoking. Chinese, Japanese, Canadian Native Indian, African-North American and Caucasian DNA samples were assessed for CYP2A6 allelic frequencies (CYP2A6*1B-*12,*1x2). Adult Caucasian non-smokers (n = 224) (1-99 cigarettes/lifetime) and smokers (n = 375) (> or = 100 cigarettes/lifetime) were assessed for demographics, tobacco/drug use history and DSM-IV dependence and genotyped for CYP2A6 alleles associated with decreased nicotine metabolism (CYP2A6*2, CYP2A6*4, CYP2A6*9, CYP2A6*12). CYP2A6 allele frequencies varied substantially among the ethnic groups. The proportion of Caucasian slow nicotine inactivators was significantly lower in current, DSM-IV dependent smokers compared to non-smokers [7.0% and 12.5%, respectively, P = 0.03, odds ratio (OR) = 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.95]; non-dependent smokers showed similar results. Daily cigarette consumption (cigarettes/day) was significantly (P = 0.003) lower for slow (21.3; 95% CI 17.4-25.2) compared to normal inactivators (28.2; 95% CI 26.4-29.9); this was observed only in DSM-IV dependent smokers. Slow inactivators had a significantly (P = 0.03) lower age of first smoking compared to normal inactivators (13.0 years of age; 95% CI 12.1-14.0 versus 14.2; 95% CI 13.8-14.6), and a trend towards smoking for a shorter duration. This study demonstrates that slow nicotine inactivators are less likely to be adult smokers (dependent or non-dependent). Slow inactivators also smoked fewer cigarettes per day and had an earlier age of first smoking (only dependent smokers).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations316
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacogeneticsSame topicSmoking Behavior and CessationFrench-language works237,207