Canadian Multiculturalism in the 21st Century: Emerging Challenges and Debates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to re-examine the value of multiculturalism and develop an argument that it is a key policy not only for nation-building, but also for ensuring a more inclusive, equal and democratic society for Canadian citizens. First, the paper introduces the historical development of multiculturalism, emphasizing the evolving meaning of multiculturalism. A meaningful evaluation of multiculturalism requires us to reframe the understanding or interpretation of the policy in the twenty-first century Canadian context where the domestic and international situations have changed tremendously in the last forty years. With this context in mind, the paper explores in what directions multiculturalism should be developed along with other Canadian values such as equality and democracy. Finally, a working argument is put forward with a vision to broadening the scope of multiculturalism, with strong emphasis on ethno-religious diversity, to include all types of cultures, so that every citizen is drawn into an inclusive and collective process in which Canada charts its discourse of national identity and nationalism. Le but de cet article est de réexaminer la valeur du multiculturalisme en soutenant qu'il forme une politique essentielle non seulement pour l'édification de la nation, mais aussi pour garantir qu'une société soit plus tolérante, égalitaire et démocratique. L'article présente en premier lieu le développement historique du multiculturalisme, en particulier en mettant l'accent sur l'évolution de ce qu'il signifie. Évaluer sérieusement ce qu'il représente nous oblige à reformuler la compréhension ou l'interprétation de sa politique dans le contexte du Canada du 21e siècle, où les situations nationales et internationales ont considérablement changé au cours de ces quarante dernières années. Dans un tel contexte, nous examinons ici dans quelles directions le multiculturalisme devrait se développer de concert avec d'autres valeurs essentielles au Canada, telles que l'égalité et la démocratie. Finalement, nous proposons d'élargir sa portée, tout en défendant vivement et strictement les questions de diversité ethnologique et religieuse, afin de pouvoir y allier toutes sortes de cultures, de façon à ce que chaque citoyen y soit accueilli dans un processus inclusif et collectif, constituant la base sur laquelle le Canada établit son discours sur l'identité nationale et le nationalisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".