MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987539647 · doi:10.1071/rdv22n1ab412

412 OVARIAN RESPONSE IN ALPACAS (VICUGNA PACOS) TO SUPERSTIMULATORY TREATMENT WITH FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE AND EQUINE CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN

2009· article· en· W1987539647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. Huanca, Olga Alicia Nieto Cárdenas, Mitzi M. Gonzales, Pedro J. García Herradón

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquine chorionic gonadotropinFollicleEndocrinologyInternal medicineFollicular phaseFollicle-stimulating hormoneGonadotropinBiologyBuserelinTransrectal ultrasonographyEstrous cycleEmbryo transferMedicineAndrologyOvulationPregnancyHormoneLuteinizing hormoneProstate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate the ovarian response in alpacas to superstimulatory treatment with FSH and eCG. Alpacas females (n = 49) were examined daily by transrectal ultrasonography using a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer (Aloka SSD500, Tokyo, Japan) to determine ovarian follicular dynamics. Alpacas (n =41) were selected when a growing follicle =7 mm in diameter was detected and were given an i.m. injection of 4 µg of buserelin (Conceptal®, Intervet, Millsboro, MD, USA) on Day 0 (i.e. beginning of treatment). On Day 2, alpacas were assigned to 1 of the following 2 treatments: (1) the FSH group (n = 21), which received a total dose of 200 mg NIH-FSH-P1 of pFSH (Folltropin®-V, Bioniche Animal Health Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada) in decreasing dosages of 52, 48, 40, 32, and 28 mg divided in twice-daily i.m. injections for 5 days; and (2) the eCG group (n = 20), which received a single dose of 750 IU of eCG (Folligon®, Intervet, Millsboro, MD, USA). Animals received an i.m. dose of 0.150 mg of triapost (PGF; Iliren, Intervet, Millsboro, MD, USA) on Day 6. On Day 7, ovaries of all alpacas were examined by transrectal ultrasonography, followed by mating and embryo collection on Day 14. Data were analyzed by ANOVA. The mean number of follicles <7 mm in diameter was 5.8 ± 1.0 and 3.2 ± 0.9 for those treated with FSH and eCG, respectively (NS). The number of follicles 7 to 13 mm in diameter was 5.8 ± 1.5 and 9.7 ± 1.2 for the FSH and eCG groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The number of follicles >13 mm in diameter was 0.3 ± 0.4 and 1.0 ± 0.3 for the FSH and eCG groups, respectively (NS). The mean (± SD) follicle diameter was 8.3 ± 0.3 and 9.0 ± 0.2 for the FSH and eCG groups, respectively (NS). The mean (± SD) number of CL was 6.0 ± 1.9 and 8.7 ± 2.3 for the FSH and eCG groups, respectively (NS). Only 82.9% of animals (34/41) were flushed and embryos were recovered in 18 animals (52.9%), with 2.7 ± 0.4 and 2.7 ± 0.7 embryos in the FSH and eCG groups, respectively (NS). Large unovulated follicles (diameter >13 mm) were observed in 34.1% of animals (14/41) on Day 14 and most of them (71.4%) were in the group treated with eCG (10/14; P < 0.05). In conclusion, the use of eCG resulted in a higher number of preovulatory follicles (7-13 mm in diameter) than FSH. However, the percentage of animals with large unovulated follicles was also higher in the eCG-treated group, resulting in no differences in the number of CL counted or embryos obtained per treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207