IA-2 antibody isotypes and epitope specificity during the prediabetic process in children with HLA-conferred susceptibility to type I diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The natural history of preclinical diabetes is partly characterized, but there is still limited information on the dynamics of the immune response to beta-cell autoantigens during the course of preclinical disease. The aim of this work was to assess the maturation of the humoral immune response to the protein tyrosine phosphatase(PTP)-related proteins (IA-2 and IA-2beta) in preclinical type I diabetes (TID). Forty-five children participating in the Finnish Type I Diabetes Prediction and Prevention (DIPP) Study who had seroconverted to IA-2 antibody positivity were analysed. Specific radiobinding assays were used to determine IA-2/IA-2beta epitope-specific antibodies (the juxtamembrane (JM) region of IA-2, PTP-like domain and betaPTP-like domain) and isotype-specific IA-2 antibodies. Individual areas under the curve (AUC) over the observation period were calculated for total IA-2 antibodies, each isotype and specific epitope responses. The children who progressed to TID tended to have an initial IA-2 JM epitope response more frequently (P = 0.06), and this response was more often dominant during the observation period (P < 0.05). The children who did not progress to TID had IgE-IA-2 more frequently (70%; versus progressors 27%; P < 0.05), and had higher integrated titres of IgE-IA-2 antibodies (P < 0.05). The occurrence of IgE-IA-2 antibodies was protective even when combined with positivity for IA-2 JM antibodies (P = 0.002). IgE-IA-2 antibody reactivity may be a marker of a regulatory immune response providing protection against or delaying progression to TID among IA-2 antibody-positive young children with HLA-conferred disease susceptibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".