MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987610260 · doi:10.1149/1.1792253

Sol-Gel Derived Pt-Ir Mixed Catalysts for DMFC Applications

2004· article· en· W1987610260 on OpenAlexafffund
Haralampos Tsaprailis, Viola Birss

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrochemical and Solid-State Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMethanolCatalysisMaterials scienceMolar ratioSol-gelElectrochemistryDirect methanol fuel cellOxideMethanol fuelChemical engineeringCarbon fibersInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryElectrodeComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin, nanoparticulate films of Pt-Ir (1.8:1 molar ratio), formed using a sol-gel derived process, show excellent activity toward methanol oxidation at room temperature for use in direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs). When compared on a mass basis to pure Pt or Ir sol-based films, Pt 1.8 Ir yields 3.5 and 6 times higher methanol oxidation activity, respectively, and is also significantly more active than carbon-supported Johnson-Matthey PtRu (1:1). When also corrected for true surface area, the Pt 1.8 Ir catalyst continues to outperform Pt and exhibits excellent stability. The Pt-Ir catalyst is most active when dried at 250°C, and conversion of Ir to Ir oxide causes significant loss in methanol oxidation activity. © 2004 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectrochemical and Solid-State LettersSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207