Effect of different carbon sources and cold shock on protein synthesis by a psychrotrophic<i>Acinetobacter</i>sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The induction of proteins after a 25 to 5 degrees C cold shock in the psychrotrophic Acinetobacter HH1-l was examined using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In addition, effects of various carbon sources (acetate, Tween 80, and olive oil) on protein synthesis after cold shock were assessed. HH1-1 responded to cold shock by synthesizing both cold shock proteins (csps) and cold acclimation proteins (caps). The synthesis of two csps (89 and 18) was increased 2 h after cold shock by the cells, regardless of the carbon source provided. An additional csp (csp 12), with an estimated molecular mass of 12 kDa, was observed in cells grown in olive oil only. Csp 12 was also synthesized when cells were incubated at 30 degrees C, suggesting that this protein may serve as a general stress protein. In addition to csps, caps were observed post cold shock at 72 h in acetate-grown cells and at 140 h in cells grown in Tween 80 and olive oil. Induction of cold-acclimated periplasmic proteins was observed for cells grown in olive oil only, suggesting cells grown in olive oil may be stressed by low temperatures to a greater extent than cells grown in either acetate or Tween 80.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".