MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long‐Term Reactive Solute Transport in an Aquitard Using a Centrifuge Model

2008· article· en· W1987681668 on OpenAlexafffund
Wendy Timms, M. Jim Hendry

Bibliographic record

VenueGround Water · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCentrifugeTRACERCentrifugationIon exchangeHydraulic conductivityChemistryAqueous solutionMaterials scienceChromatographyEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceIonPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characterizing and predicting reactive solute transport in low hydraulic conductivity (K) clay-rich media is challenging because the very long transport time for solutes renders conventional column tests impractical. In this study, a centrifugation technique was developed to assess the transport of a simple aqueous solution (NaCl) by accelerating flow by centrifugal force through low K (1.1 x 10(-11) m/s) core samples. Duplicate cores (52-mm length x 33-mm diameter) were centrifuged at 330 xg for 90 d to model the migration of saline pore water (0.5 M NaCl) under in situ conditions through an approximately 17-m-thick clay prototype over approximately 24,000 years. A PHREEQC one-dimensional reactive solute transport code simulated effluent breakthrough of the NaCl during centrifugation, with best-fit cation exchange coefficients similar to batch tests. The calibrated code was used to predict solute profile development over the long term in the prototype or simulated field-scale conditions. Chromatographic separation of solutes due to ion exchange was evident over several meters in the simulated prototype and the field profile. The applicability of centrifugation methods to predict transport of more complex suites of reactive solutes over the long term is yet to be verified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGround WaterSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207