A murine model for induction of long-term immunologic tolerance to factor VIII does not require persistent detectable levels of plasma factor VIII and involves contributions from Foxp3+ T regulatory cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under certain instances, factor VIII (FVIII) stimulates an immune response, and the resulting neutralizing antibodies present a significant clinical challenge. Immunotherapies to re-establish or induce long-term tolerance would be beneficial, and an in-depth knowledge of mechanisms involved in tolerance induction is essential to develop immune-modulating strategies. We have developed a murine model system for studying mechanisms involved in induction of immunologic tolerance to FVIII in hemophilia A mice. We used lentiviral vectors to deliver the canine FVIII transgene to neonatal hemophilic mice and demonstrated that induction of long-term FVIII tolerance could be achieved. Hemophilia A mice are capable of mounting a robust immune response to FVIII after neonatal gene transfer, and tolerance induction is dependent on the route of delivery and type of promoter used. High-level expression of FVIII was not required for tolerance induction and, indeed, tolerance developed in some animals without evidence of detectable plasma FVIII. Tolerance to FVIII could be adoptively transferred to naive hemophilia recipient mice, and FVIII-stimulated splenocytes isolated from tolerized mice expressed increased levels of interleukin-10 and decreased levels of interleukin-6 and interferon-gamma. Finally, induction of FVIII tolerance mediated by this protocol is associated with a FVIII-expandable population of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".