MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987763850 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2010.1690

Quantitative measurements of apoptotic cell properties using acoustic microscopy

2010· article· en· W1987763850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttenuationAcoustic impedanceMaterials scienceAcoustic microscopySIGNAL (programming language)Attenuation coefficientBackscatter (email)Acoustic attenuationCorrelation coefficientUltrasonic sensorAcousticsOpticsPhysicsMicroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-resolved acoustic microscopy was used to measure properties of cells such as the thickness, sound velocity, acoustic impedance, density, bulk modulus, and attenuation, before and after apoptosis. A total of 12 cells were measured, 5 apoptotic and 7 non-apoptotic. Measurements made at 375 MHz showed a statistically significant increase in the cell thickness from 13.6 ± 3.1 μm to 17.3 ± 1.6 μm, and in the attenuation from 1.08 ± 0.21 dB/cm/MHz to 1.74 ± 0.36 dB/cm/MHz. The other parameters, such as the sound velocity, density, acoustic impedance, and bulk modulus remained similar within experimental error. Acoustic images obtained at 1.0 GHz showed increased RF-signal backscatter and a clear delineation of the nucleus and cytoplasm from apoptotic cells compared with non-apoptotic cells. Extensive activity was observed optically and acoustically within apoptotic cells. Acoustic measurements made one minute apart showed variations in the ultrasonic backscatter but not attenuation in the cells, which indicated rapid structural changes were occurring but not changes in bulk composition. The normalized crosscorrelation coefficient was used to quantify the variations in the backscatter RF-signal during apoptosis by comparing the first RF signal measured to each successive RF signal every 10 s. A coefficient of 1 indicates strong correlation, whereas a coefficient of 0 indicates no correlation. An average correlation coefficient of 0.93 ± 0.05 was measured for non-apoptotic cells, compared with 0.68 ± 0.17 for apoptotic cells, indicating that the RF signal as a function of time varied rapidly during apoptosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it