MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987773591 · doi:10.1115/ajtec2011-44109

Thermodiffusion in a Binary Fluid Mixture Subject to External Vibrations: Effect of Variable Physical Properties

2011· article· en· W1987773591 on OpenAlexaff
Aram Parsa, M. Ziad Saghir

Bibliographic record

VenueASME/JSME 2011 8th Thermal Engineering Joint Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicField-Flow Fractionation Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsTemperature gradientThermal diffusivityVibrationThermalConvectionDiffusionMaterials sciencePhysicsThermodynamicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A microgravity environment is essential for studying the phenomenon of thermodiffusion in order to suppress the microscopic flows in the mixture. It is, however, noted that the residual micro accelerations (g-jitters) in the space laboratories is produced by several sources such as crew activities, mechanical systems, thrusters firing, spacecraft docking, etc. Such external forces lead to significant flows which can induce convection that may affect the accuracy of the experiment. Consequently, an appropriate interpretation of the space experimental results relies on theoretical and numerical studies of the g-jitter effect on the temperature and the concentration fields. In this paper, we have modeled the thermodiffusion experiment subjected to different levels of vibration when the steady gravity is assumed zero. A rectangular cavity that is subjected to a thermal gradient is filled with a binary mixture (water and isopropanol) and put under the influence of different levels of vibrations. The thermal gradient is applied perpendicular to the vibration. All physical properties including density, mass diffusion and thermodiffusion coefficients are assumed variable as function of temperature and concentration using PC-SAFT equation of state. It is found that using variable physical properties including density and diffusion coefficients make the results more realistic in comparison with the constant model especially in cases with higher Rayleigh vibrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME/JSME 2011 8th Thermal Engineering Joint ConferenceSame topicField-Flow Fractionation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207