Pulsar microstructure and its quasi-periodicities with the S2 VLBI system at a resolution of 62.5 nanoseconds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a study of microstructure and its quasi-periodicities of three pulsars at 1.65 GHz with the S2 VLBI system at a resolution of 62.5 ns, by far the highest for any such statistical study yet. For PSR B1929+10 we found in the average cross-correlation function (CCF) broad microstructure with a characteristic timescale of and confirmed microstructure with characteristic timescales between 100 and for PSRs B0950+08 and B1133+16. On a finer scale PSRs B0950+08, B1133+16 (component II) and B1929+10 show narrow microstructure with a characteristic timescale in the CCFs of ∼10 , the shortest found in the average CCF or autocorrelation function (ACF) for any pulsar, apart perhaps for the Crab pulsar. Histograms of microstructure widths are skewed heavily toward shorter timescales but display a sharp cutoff. The shortest micropulses have widths between 2 and . There is some indication that the timescales of the broad, narrow, and shortest micropulses are, at least partly, related to the widths of the components of the integrated profiles and the subpulse widths. If the shortest micropulses observed are indeed due to beaming then the ratio, γ, of the relativistic energy of the emitting particles to the rest energy is about 20 000, independent of the pulsar period. We predict an observable lower limit for the width of micropulses from these pulsars at 1.65 GHz of . If the short micropulses are instead interpreted as a radial modulation of the radiation pattern, then the associated emitting sources have dimensions of about 3 km in the observer's frame. For PSRs B0950+08 and B1133+16 (both components) the micropulses had a residual dispersion delay over a 16-MHz frequency difference of ∼2 when compared to that of average pulse profiles over a much larger relative and absolute frequency range. This residual delay is likely the result of propagation effects in the pulsar magnetosphere that contribute to limiting the width of micropulses. No nanopulses or unresolved pulse spikes were detected. Cross-power spectra of single pulses show a large range of complexity with single spectral features representing classic quasi-periodicities and broad and overlapping features with essentially no periodicities at all. Significant differences were found for the two components of PSR B1133+16 in every aspect of our statistical analysis of micropulses and their quasi-periodicities. Asymmetries in the magnetosphere and the hollow cone of emission above the polar cap of the neutron star may be responsible for these differences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".