Submegabase resolution of epistatically interacting quantitative trait loci for blood pressure applicable for essential hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for blood pressure to large chromosome segments is readily achievable, their final identification confronts formidable hurdles. Restriction of the genes lodging in one quantitative trait locus interval to experimental limitation can facilitate their positional cloning. We previously delineated several quantitative trait loci for blood pressure on chromosome 10 of Dahl salt-sensitive rats, but their chromosome delimitations were either large or not definitive. METHODS: In this study, we systematically and comprehensively constructed congenic strains with submegabase (Mb) genome resolution and analyzed their blood pressure by telemetry. RESULTS: Three quantitative trait loci have been conclusively delimited by three congenic strains, each independently lowering the blood pressure. Their intervals are demarcated by genomic regions between 350 and 910 kilobases (kb) in size. Two of the three quantitative trait loci share an epistatic relationship and are separated from one another by less than 170 kb. Two additional quantitative trait loci for blood pressure were also tentatively delineated and their intervals range from 520 kb to 1.75 Mb. Possible genes dwelling in each quantitative trait locus-interval number between 11 and 17. None of these genes is known to exert a functional impact on blood pressure. Work is underway to find candidate genes with mutations that could be responsible for the blood pressure effect. CONCLUSION: Novel diagnostic, prognostic, preventive and/or therapeutic targets for essential hypertension and hypertension-associated diseases are likely to emerge from the identification of these quantitative trait loci. Potential applications of these quantitative trait loci to humans are suggested from the positive results from several association studies, demonstrating the existence of quantitative trait loci in the broad homologous regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".