MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1987939091 · doi:10.1117/12.707667

Er<sup>3+</sup>- Yb<sup>3+</sup>co-doped phosphate glass optical fiber for application at 1.54 microns

2006· article· en· W1987939091 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Lafond, Jocelyne Osouf, Pierre Laperle, Jean-Luc Soucy, Cynthia Desrosiers, Steeve Morency, André Croteau, André Parent

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut National d'Optique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials sciencePhosphate glassYtterbiumOptical fiberAbsorption (acoustics)DopingFiberRefractive indexCladding (metalworking)OpticsChemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present current work developed at INO on phosphate glass optical fiber for laser and amplifier applications at 1.54 microns. Core and cladding glasses were fabricated by a multi-components melting process which gave an uniform refractive index core profile. Rod-in-tube method under Argon atmosphere was used to fabricate optical fibers. The effect of nitrogen atmosphere on hydroxyl groups OH- during glass melting was studied. The absorption coefficient calculated at 3.42 μm was found to be lower than 0.5 cm-1 which corresponds to less than 70 ppm OH-. Absorption and emission cross sections were calculated at 1534 nm. Fabrication process allowed us to decrease background losses of core Er3+ - Yb3+ co-doped fiber between 0.02 and 0.04 dB/cm. Laser power was measured at 1563 nm and a 26% slope efficiency was achieved with a 22 cm-long single-clad fiber co-doped with 1.1 wt% in Er3+ and 11.1 wt% in Yb3+. For the same fiber, an internal gain was found to be 20 dB at 1536 nm for a 5-cm-long fiber.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicGlass properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207