The impact of PTSD on pain experience in persons with HIV/AIDS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pain is a common and pervasive symptom for persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Individuals with persistent pain are known to be at heightened risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), an anxiety disorder that manifests itself following exposure to a traumatic event. Moreover, research suggests that patients with persistent pain who develop PTSD often experience greater pain intensity and pain-related disability than those who do not develop PTSD. The purpose of this study was to assess the relation of PTSD to pain intensity and pain-related interference in HIV-infected persons suffering from persistent pain. Study participants included 145 ambulatory persons living with HIV/AIDS (PWHAs) who were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial assessing the impact of a pain communication intervention. Participants completed a series of self-report measures including the Stressful Life Events Checklist (SLE), the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian (PCL-C), the Mental Health Inventory (MHI), and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). On average, participants reported being exposed to 6.3 different types of trauma over the course of their lifetime, of which receiving an HIV diagnosis was rated as being among the most stressful. Over half (53.8%) merited a PTSD diagnosis according to the PCL-C. Those with PTSD reported having significantly higher pain intensity and greater pain-related interference in performance of daily activities (i.e., working, sleeping, walking ability and general activity), and affect (i.e., mood, relations with other people, enjoyment of life) over time than those who did not meet the diagnostic criteria. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed along with implications for clinical care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".