Nitrate leaching in the semiarid prairie : Effect of cropping frequency, crop type, and fertilizer after 37 years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A high NO 3 concentration in drinking water can be a health hazard. Further, leached N represents an economic loss to the producer. Although NO 3 leaching to ground water would be minimal on the semiarid prairies, leaching can occur especially where frequent summer fallowing is practiced. We used a crop rotation study, initiated in 1967 on a medium-textured Orthic Brown Chernozem, at Swift Current, Saskatchewan, to determine the influences of fallow frequency, crop types, and fertilizer on nitrate leaching after 37 yr. Nitrate distribution was measured to 4.5 m depth by 0.3-m increments, in 10 cropping systems in fall 2003. We deduced that some NO 3 leached beyond the rooting depth (1.2 m) of spring wheat (Triticum aetivium L.), especially under a fallow-wheat rotation receiving N and P fertilizer. The amounts of NO 3 leached tended to be greater and to be located deeper in the soil profile as fallow frequency increased (e.g., fallow-wheat > fallow-wheat-wheat > continuous wheat, all receiving N and P fertilizer based on soil test). However, in this semiarid environment, NO 3 leaching was not great, being highest under fallow-wheat (N + P) (180 kg N ha -1 leached in 37 yr). In fallow-containing systems inadequate fertilizer N or P resulted in reduced crop growth and N uptake leading to a tendency for greater leaching of the NO 3 (about 145 kg N ha -1 in 37 yr) mineralized during the fallow period than when such a system received N and P based on soil tests (about 66 kg N ha -1 leached in 37 yr). In continuously cropped treatments there was little evidence of leaching. Replacing wheat grown on fallow with the shallow-rooted flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) in a fallowwheat-wheat (N + P) rotation resulted in greater NO 3 leaching in the flax system (156 vs. 66 kg N ha -1 ) due to less N uptake by flax. In contrast, when the wheat grown on fallow was replaced with fall rye (Secale cereale L.) there was no leaching, perhaps because the fallow period was much shorter (12 mo compared with 20 mo for spring wheat) and also because the fall-seeded crop used soil NO 3 in the fall and early spring reducing opportunities for leaching. Key words: Wheat, flax, fall rye, lentil, cropping frequency
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".