MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988033727 · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/12/6/317

Theoretical limits on the freestanding length of cantilevers produced by surface micromachining technology

2002· article· en· W1988033727 on OpenAlex
Robert W. Johnstone, M. Parameswaran

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface micromachiningCantileverMaterials scienceNanotechnologyBulk micromachiningSurface (topology)Microelectromechanical systemsOptoelectronicsEngineeringComposite materialFabricationGeometryMathematicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine the maximum possible length of freestanding micromachined cantilevers, in this paper we provide a theoretical analysis of three important forces on cantilevers, namely acceleration, Casimir and Coulomb forces. The analysis provides theoretical limits to cantilever lengths separate from the well-known effects of surface adhesion and capillary collapse. This analysis offers an insight into the problem of in-use stiction in microstructures, which is a major source of functional failure in dynamic micromechanical systems. In this paper we conclude with a table that lists the maximum free standing length of microstructures that would offer reliable operation without stick–slip motion, excluding the possible effects of surface adhesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it