MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988036797 · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.12.004

No relationship between the ins del polymorphism of the serotonin transporter promoter and pain perception in fibromyalgia patients and healthy controls

2010· article· en· W1988036797 on OpenAlexafffund
Stéphane Potvin, Annie Larouche, Edith Normand, Juliana Barcellos de Souza, Isabelle Gaumond, Serge Marchand, Sylvain Grignon

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Pain · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsFibromyalgiaSerotonin transporterPolymorphism (computer science)SerotoninPsychologyPain perceptionPerceptionMedicineInternal medicinePsychiatryNeurosciencePhysical therapyGeneticsBiologyGeneReceptorAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In animals, decades of research have shown that serotonin (5-HT) is involved in endogenous pain inhibition systems, which are deficient in chronic pain disorders such as fibromyalgia (FM). In humans, there is preliminary evidence showing that 5-HT is involved in the FM pathophysiology. In the current endophenotyping study, we sought to investigate, for the first time in humans, the relationships between the serotonin transporter promoter region (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism and experimentally-induced pain perception/inhibition in healthy controls (HC) and FM patients. METHODS: Participants were 58 FM patients and 60 HC, who did not differ in age, sex or menstrual cycle. Thermal stimuli were used to measure pain thresholds. Pain inhibition was elicited using a tonic thermal test (Peltier thermode) administered before and after activation of the diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) by means of a cold-pressor test (CPT). RESULTS: Thermal pain thresholds were higher in HC compared to FM patients. Pain ratings during the CPT were lower in HC, relative to FM patients. Also, DNIC efficacy was stronger in HC compared to FM patients. However, there was no relationship between 5-HTTLPR and experimentally-induced pain perception/inhibition. DISCUSSION: Our results further confirm that FM is associated with thermal hyperalgesia and deficient DNIC. However, we found no evidence showing that the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism influences pain perception and DNIC. Potential reasons for this negative result will be discussed. Further endophenotyping studies of 5-HT-related gene polymorphisms are required to ascertain the potential relationships between 5-HT and human pain perception/inhibition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of PainSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207