Agonist‐ and antagonist‐induced sequestration/internalization of neuropeptide Y Y<sub>1</sub> receptors in HEK293 cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Neuropeptide Y Y(1) receptors are known to internalize following the binding of agonists. In the present study, a pseudopeptide Y(1) receptor antagonist, homodimeric Ile-Glu-Pro-Dpr-Tyr-Arg-Leu-Arg-Tyr-CONH(2) (GR231118), also induced Y(1) receptor internalization in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. 2 We demonstrated first that both specifically bound radiolabeled antagonist ([(125)I]GR231118) and agonist ([(125)I][Leu(31), Pro(34)]PYY) underwent receptor-mediated sequestration/internalization in transfected HEK293 cells. 3 Agonist-induced Y(1) receptor internalization was dependent on clathrin-coated pits and was regulated in part by Gi/o-protein activation as revealed by pertussin toxin sensitivity. In contrast, antagonist-induced sequestration of Y(1) receptors was partly dependent on clathrin-coated pits, but independent from Gi/o-protein activation. 4 Exposure to high concentrations of agonist or antagonist caused a 50 and 75% loss of cell surface binding, respectively. The loss caused by the agonist rapidly recovered. This phenomenon was blocked by monensin, an inhibitor of endosome acidification, suggesting that cell surface receptor recovery is due to recycling. In contrast to the agonist, GR231118 induced a long-lasting sequestration of Y(1) receptors in HEK293 cells. 5 Immunofluorescence labeling indicated that following 40 min of incubation with either the agonist or the antagonist, Y(1) receptors followed markedly different intercellular trafficking pathways. 6 Taken together, these findings provided evidence that a pseudopeptide Y(1) receptor antagonist can induce long-lasting disappearance of cell surface receptors through a pathway distinct from the classical endocytic/recycling pathway followed by stimulation with an agonist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".