Brain sodium channels and central sodium-induced increases in brain ouabain-like compound and blood pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of benzamil-sensitive sodium channels in the increases in brain ouabain-like compounds (OLC) and in blood pressure by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Na+. METHODS: Artificial CSF (aCSF) or Na+-rich (0.8 mol/l Na+) aCSF, either alone or combined with benzamil (at 1.2 and 4.0 microg/kg per h), were infused intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) at 5 microl/h to Wistar rats for 14 days and the effects on the brain and peripheral OLC and blood pressure were studied. OLC content was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: In Wistar rats infused i.c.v. with aCSF, benzamil did not affect blood pressure or brain and peripheral OLC concentrations. I.c.v. infusion of Na+-rich aCSF increased systolic blood pressure (140 +/- 4 mmHg compared with 119 +/- 3 mmHg; P < 0.05). Benzamil fully blocked this increase. Na+-rich aCSF increased hypothalamic (23 +/- 3 ng/g tissue compared with 10 +/- 1 ng/g tissue; P < 0.05) and pituitary (233 +/- 35 ng/g tissue compared with 62 +/- 7 ng/g tissue; P < 0.05) contents of OLC. In contrast, Na+-rich aCSF decreased OLC in the adrenal gland (7 +/- 1 ng/g tissue compared with 21 +/- 3 ng/g tissue; P < 0.05) and plasma (0.5 +/- 0.04 ng/ml compared with 0.7 +/- 0.08 ng/ml; P < 0.05). Benzamil inhibited these responses of OLC to CSF sodium in a dose-related manner. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that benzamil-sensitive brain sodium channels mediate the increase in brain OLC and the subsequent hypertension induced by increased CSF Na+.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".