New Silylated Iminophosphorano(amino)phosphines Me<sub>3</sub>SiNPPh<sub>2</sub>N(R)PPh<sub>2</sub>(R = Et,<i><sup>n</sup></i>Pr,<i><sup>n</sup></i>Bu). Crystal and Molecular Structure of Trimethylsilyliminophosphorano(propylamino)diphenylphosphine Me<sub>3</sub>SiNPPh<sub>2</sub>N(<i><sup>n</sup></i>Pr)PPh<sub>2</sub>. Further Oxidative Derivatization with S, Se, and Azides, Titanium(IV) Transmetalation of the Imine, and Syntheses of Rhodium(I), Palladium(II), and Platinum(II) Complexes of These Iminophosphorano(amino)phosphines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bis(phosphino)amines Ph(2)PN(R)PPh(2) (R = Et, (n)Pr, (n)Bu) react with stoichiometric amounts of trimethylsilyl azide to give the trimethylsilyliminophosphorano(amino)phosphines Me(3)SiN=PPh(2)N(R)PPh(2) (1, R = Et; 2, R = (n)Pr; 3, R = (n)Bu) as crystalline compounds. The structure of 2 has been determined by single-crystal X-ray analysis. (Crystal data for 2: monoclinic, P2(1)/c, a = 10.235(1) A, b = 16.802(2) A, c = 17.075(2) A, beta = 101.05(1) degrees, V = 2882.9(5) A(3), Z = 4.) The structure of 2, which is the first example of an iminophosphoranophosphine with the P(III)-N-P(V)=N skeleton, was solved by direct methods and refined to R = 0.044. Compound 2 readily reacts with elemental sulfur, selenium, or phosphoryl azide to give fully oxidized phosphinimines Ph(2)P(E)N((n)()Pr)Ph(2)P=NSiMe(3) (4, E = S; 5, E = Se; 6, E = NP(O)(OPh)(2)). Compounds 4-6 are very sensitive to moisture and readily undergo desilylation to give the parent phosphinimines Ph(2)P(E)N((n)()Pr)Ph(2)P=NH, which can be isolated as moderately stable crystalline solids. The phosphiniminophosphine 2 and the oxidized phosphinimines (4 and 5) react with CpTiCl(3) to give new nitrogen-bound Ti(IV) derivatives Ph(2)P(E)N((n)Pr)Ph(2)P=NTi(Cp)Cl(2) (10, E = lone pair; 11, E = S; 12, E = Se). Compounds 1-3 readily react with rhodium(I), palladium(II), and platinum(II) complexes to give five-membered metallacycles via phosphorus(III) and imine nitrogen coordination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".