Imaging of single GaN nanowires by tip‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Raman imaging of a single [1 1 0] GaN nanowire using a combination of an atomic force microscope (AFM) and an inverted confocal microscope was investigated. The Raman spectra and associated maps of this single object, the diameter of which was of 200 nm, were collected in both confocal mode and with the interaction of an AFM tip to benefit from local tip enhancement effect. Beyond the pure tip‐enhanced Raman scattering (TERS) effect, the setup was developed to integrate a commercial AFM and spectrometer to permit simultaneous topography and vibrational imaging with spatial and spectral resolutions determined by the respective instruments. Data exchange and communication of the Raman spectrometer and the AFM were optimized to display both height and Raman intensity for a set of Z positions at the AFM tip for each ( x,y ) position on the sample. The experiments were conducted with both a straight tip coated with gold at an excitation of λ = 647 nm and with a tilted tip coated with silver at an excitation wavelength of λ = 514 nm. The TERS signal was observed for a given phonon mode of the [1 1 0] nanowire, providing an optical resolution that corresponds to the size of the object. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it