MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988386811 · doi:10.4103/0019-5049.111884

Azygous vein rupture after right internal jugular vein cannulation: A rare complication

2013· article· en· W1988386811 on OpenAlexaff
SachidanandJee Bharati, Tumul Chowdhury, Harsh Sapra

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Anaesthesia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePneumothoraxAnesthesiaSurgeryInternal jugular veinSeldinger techniqueIntensive care unitComplicationInternal medicineCatheter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, Catheterisation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) is commonly practiced for central venous access in intensive care unit (ICU); however, may cause significant complications such as internal carotid artery puncture, pneumothorax, vessel erosion, thrombosis, airway obstruction and infection. Here, we have reported an unusual; however, dreaded complication of IJV cannulation. A 45-year-old male patient admitted to ICU with burn over chest (20%) and bilateral lower limb crush injury with cellulitis. Patient was haemodynamically stable and maintained oxygen saturation (SpO2 >95%) on the face mask. In view of poor venous access, the central venous cannulation in right IJV was planned. Under full aseptic precaution, right IJV was cannulated in 2nd attempt, triple lumen was inserted using seldinger technique and fixed at 12 cm after confirming backflow. A check X-ray chest was carried out, which showed tip of central venous (CV) line in 2nd intercostal (IC) space. Four hours after CV line placement, the patient complained of difficulty in breathing, chest pain, falling oxygen saturation and became haemodynamically unstable (BP <90/50 mm Hg). To rule out pneumothorax, repeat X-ray chest was carried out and it showed right haemothorax. The patient condition further deteriorated and was intubated and put on ventilatory support. Even with ventilator support, he was not maintaining saturation (SpO2 <92%) and blood pressure continued to fall and inotropic support was started (Dopamine infusion 6-10 mcg/kg/min). A diagnostic tap was carried out, 200 ml of hemorrhagic fluid was aspirated and intercostal drain (ICD) was put in the 5th IC space. ICD drained 1200 ml of hemorrhagic fluid within 30 min. Patient was transfused two packed red cells. Haemodynamic parameters improved (BP = 100/60 mm Hg and SpO2 >95%). Six hours after ICD placement his haemodynamic again became unstable. ICD repositioning was carried out, a contrast enhanced computed tomogram (CECT) chest was carried out, which showed a right hemothorax with mediastinal shift. Thoracic team decided to do an emergency video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). During the VATS, 2.5 l of collected blood was evacuated and a puncture in the azygous vein was visualised. Bleeding point in the azygous vein was repaired and the patient was shifted to ICU [Figure 1]. Patient condition improved, haemodynamics stabilised and was extubated on the 2nd post-operative day. ICD was removed on 4th post-operative day.Figure 1: Post-procedure X-ray chestRarer vascular injuries during the central vein cannulation are reported and impose serious adverse effects.[1] Two retrospective reviews highlighted the possibility of central line migration in azygous vein; however, all of these catheters were placed from the left (subclavian vein, peripherally inserted central (PICC) line, and IJV) side and had 19% venous perforation.[23] Our report is 1st one, which highlights the azygous vein rupture during right sided cannulation of IJV. The injury might result either during guide wire insertion or dilatation phase. Vigilant monitoring and timely intervention could save the life of this patient. In conclusion, one should always suspect azygous vein rupture in patient with right hemothorax after right IJV cannulation if other possible causes have been ruled out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of AnaesthesiaSame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207