Supplementation of a Successful Pediatric Neuro-oncology Telemedicine-Based Twinning Program by E-Mails
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of linking experts together for common interest, often called twinning, promotes a sharing of knowledge through effective communications. A retrospective review of 356 e-mail communications between the King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) (Amman, Jordan) and the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) was conducted. The review of this set of e-mails from a 29-month period (August 3–December 5) provided a wide range of interactions between the two sites, including clinical, administration, and educational activities. All e-mail was initiated by the KHCC. Twinning permitted substantial improvement in pediatric neuro-oncology, especially when resources and expertise at the originating site are limited. There is a growing gap between developing and developed countries in the availability of treatment for pediatric subspecialties. Twinning and telemedicine are effective ways to improve the quality of healthcare in developing countries. We evaluated the impact of e-mail exchanges on the development of a neuro-oncology twinning program between the King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, Jordan, and the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. We conducted a retrospective review of all e-mail communications between KHCC and the Hospital for Sick Children from August 2003 to December 2005 for subject, attachments, and responses. Over a period of 29 months, 356 e-mail exchanges (average, 12.3/month) occurred. Subjects discussed were specific consults (88), videoconferencing (65), general neuro-oncological questions (54), personal (45), exchange visits related (44), research projects related (28), articles or treatment guidelines (21), and Web site translation (11). Our study suggests that e-mails promote effective communication between twinning partners and enable discussion of complex cases, organization of teleconferences and workshops, aid other research activities, and further personal relationships between partners. Use of e-mail in telemedicine can be especially useful to improve the quality of care for children with cancer in developing countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".