MRI and contrast‐enhanced ultrasound monitoring of prostate microwave focal thermal therapy: An in vivo canine study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, and microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessment of the thermal lesion created by interstitial microwave heating of the normal canine prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A microwave antenna was inserted into each lobe of the prostate in seven dogs to induce coagulation necrosis. Immediately after therapy the lesion was assessed using CEUS, DCE-MRI, and DWI. The prostates were excised, photographed, and prepared for hematoxylin and eosin staining. Results from posttreatment MRI and ultrasound were compared to histology. RESULTS: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was slightly lowered within the thermal lesion but was drastically reduced in a ring-like region that corresponds to a grossly appearing red thermal damage zone immediately peripheral to the central coagulum. Both DCE-MRI and CEUS delineated a smaller area of vascular damage, for which the borders lie within the red zone. CONCLUSION: The red zone encompasses a range of vascular responses, including hyperemia and hemostasis, and is known to progress to necrosis and tissue nonviability. DWI clearly depicts this zone as a region of sharply reduced ADC, and may be better than contrast-enhanced imaging for accurate assessment of the eventual full extent of thermal damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".