MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optically active aromatic amino acids. Part VI. Synthesis and properties of [Leu5]-enkephalin analogues containing O-methyl-L-tyrosine1 with ring substitution at position 3′

2000· article· en· W1988571754 on OpenAlexaff
Z. Arnold, Peter W. Schiller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Peptide Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryStereochemistryAgonistEnkephalinReceptorBiochemistryOpioid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Twelve new [Tyr(Me)1, Leu5]-enkephalin analogues with substituents at position 3' of the Tyr ring have been synthesized using traditional solution methods. The substituents were -CO2H, -CONH2, -CO2Me, -(E)-CH=NOH, -(E)-CH=NOMe and CH2OH. The analogues were C-terminated with methyl esters, amides or as free acids. In the in vitro biological assays a remarkable agonist activity to the opiate receptor mu in guinea pig ileum (GPI) relative to Leu-ENK was shown by the following: Leu-ENK, 100; [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2Me)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (I), 8.1; [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (VI), 26.2; [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-OH5]-ENK (VII), 2.9; [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (VIII), 4.7; and [Tyr(Me)(3'-CH2OH)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (X), 5.6. The agonist effect was naltrexone- or naloxone-reversible. The masking of the hydroxyl group in (E)-hydroxyiminomethyl group of analogue (VI) by O-methylation has totally abolished its GPI agonist activity. It seems that the (E)-CH=NOH group shows affinity and plays an analogous role to the phenol group Tyr1 in leucine-enkephalin and in the tyramine group of the opiate alkaloids. The analogues: [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2Me)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (I), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2H)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (II), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2Me)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (III), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CO2H)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (IV), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CONH2)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (V), [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (VI), [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-OH5]-ENK (VII), [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOH)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (VIII), [Tyr(Me)(3'-(E)-CH=NOMe)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (IX), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CH2OH)1, Leu-OMe5]-ENK (X), [Tyr(Me)(3'-CH2OH)1, Leu-OH5]-ENK (XI) and [Tyr(Me)(3'-CH2OH)1, Leu-NH2(5)]-ENK (XII) under testing had no significant agonist activity to the enkephalinergic receptor in mouse vas deferens (MVD). All methyl esters of synthesized analogues of [Leu5]-ENK showed higher activity to mu receptors than structurally identical C-terminal amides. It is a surprising result since usually C-terminate amides are stronger agonists than C-terminate esters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Peptide ScienceSame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207