MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988580242 · doi:10.1086/ahr.114.3.750

:“A Happy Holiday”: English Canadians and Transatlantic Tourism, 1870–1930

2009· article· en· W1988580242 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lisa Chilton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismHistoryMedia studiesEconomic historySociologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past decade, a wide range of histories has been published that has moved the study of the British world in interesting new directions. A compelling theme in this recent literature relates to the formation and development of social identities. Through studies that re-evaluate the meanings of imperialism in Britain, through studies that offer new ways of looking at the internal dynamics of “white settler societies,” and through studies that contain revisionist assessments of the social/cultural outcomes of people's movements between colonies and metropole, the field is currently undergoing a process of revitalization and renewal. Cecilia Morgan's book offers readers a thoughtful contribution to this field of study. As Morgan explains in her introduction, this work is concerned with tourists' “discourses and practices” rather than with the workings of the transatlantic tourist industry itself. At the heart of the book is an assessment of the place of transatlantic holidays in the development of middle-class English Canadians' senses of personal and national identity. Morgan argues that the experiences gained overseas in Britain and in Europe, together with the process of chronicling those experiences, played an important role in the development of Anglo-Canadians' understandings of their own place within an imperial, and global, context. However, as Morgan notes, her aim is to make meaning of the in-transit articulations of those holiday experiences rather than to assess in any sustained way how personal experiences and their dissemination through correspondence and publication actually affected Canadian culture and social relations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.012
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207