MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

OC004—Fetal Exposure To Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs (Nsaid) And Spontaneous Abortions

2013· article· en· W1988586951 on OpenAlexaff
Sharon Daniel, Gideon Koren, Eitan Lunenfeld, Amalia Levy

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Therapeutics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbortionPregnancyRetrospective cohort studyHazard ratioObstetricsConfidence intervalPopulationCohort studyProportional hazards modelRelative riskCohortInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionSpontaneous abortions are the most common complication of pregnancy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are among the most widely used groups of drugs during the first trimester of pregnancy. Published data are inconsistent regarding the risk for spontaneous abortions after exposure to NSAID.Patients (or Materials) and MethodsA population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted including all women who conceived between January 2003 and December 2009 and admitted for birth or diagnosed with spontaneous abortion at Soroka Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Israel. A computerized database of medication dispension was linked with 2 computerized databases containing information on births and spontaneous abortions. Time-varying COX regression models were constructed adjusting for mother’s age, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, hypercoagulable or inflammatory conditions, history of recurrent miscarriages, presence of intrauterine contraceptive device, ethnicity, and self-reporting tobacco use during pregnancy and the year of pregnancy.ResultsThere were 65,457 women who conceived during the study period and admitted at SMC: 58,949 (90.1%) for birth and 6508 (9.9%) for spontaneous abortion. A total of 4495 (6.9%) pregnant women were exposed to NSAID during the study period. Exposure to NSAID was not an independent risk factor for spontaneous abortion as groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–1.20 and adjusted HR, 1.67; 95% CI 0.95–2.95 for nonselective and selective COX2 inhibitors, respectively) or as specific drugs. Additionally, no dose response effect was found.ConclusionIn this large population-based retrospective cohort study, no increased risk for spontaneous abortions was found following exposure to NSAID Table.TableThe unadjusted and adjusted risk (hazard ratios and 95% CI) for spontaneous abortion following exposure to NSAID: results from time-varying multivariate Cox regression models.Exposure to:Spontaneous Abortions Hazard Ratio (95% CI)UnadjustedAdjusted*Nonselective COX inhibitors1.13 (1.01–1.25)1.08 (0.97–1.20)Ibuprofen1.13 (0.98–1.30)1.05 (0.92–1.21)Diclofenac1.21 (0.98–1.48)1.19 (0.97–1.47)Indomethacin3.54 (2.20–5.71)3.33 (2.06–5.36)Naproxen1.87 (0.66–1.17)0.88 (0.66–1.18)Etodolac1.26 (0.88 –1.80)0.14 (0.8–1.64)COX2 selective inhibitors1.97 (1.12–3.47)1.67 (0.95–2.95) Open table in a new tab Disclosure of InterestNone declared. IntroductionSpontaneous abortions are the most common complication of pregnancy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are among the most widely used groups of drugs during the first trimester of pregnancy. Published data are inconsistent regarding the risk for spontaneous abortions after exposure to NSAID.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical TherapeuticsSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207