Polymorphism and Structure in a Pentamorphic Guest−Host Material: The Tris(5-acetyl-3-thienyl) Methane (TATM) Inclusion Compound with 1,3-Dichloropropane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we describe the preparation and structural properties of five polymorphs of the 1G:2H, 1,3-dichloropropane/tris (5-acetyl-3-thienyl) methane (TATM) inclusion compound. A number of different preparative methods were used to give products whose structures were solved by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. In addition, solid-state 13 C NMR spectroscopy and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) were used for bulk phase identification. On the basis of the unit cell parameters determined from single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments, the PXRD results were used to resolve the products as being from either pure or mixed phases. In four of the five forms, the host TATM molecules have similar torsional conformations and share a common layered motif. The guest molecules are disordered and reside in cages or channels that are formed from the stacking of these layers. In the fifth form, the conformation of the TATM host molecules differ significantly, and the disordered guests reside in a pronounced zigzag channel. Apparently, slightly different conformations for the host and the flexile guest give structures that differ little in energy. The results suggest that minor changes in synthetic procedures can have a profound effect on the structure of the resulting crystalline product. Some of the structures presented here are closely related to other structures previously reported for TATM inclusion compounds with a variety of guests, suggesting that this may be a particularly rich area for studying polymorphism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".