Carbon Isotope Fractionation of PCE and TCE During Dechlorination by Vitamin B12
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reductive dechlorination of perchloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) by vitamin B12 is an analogue of the microbial reductive dechlorination reaction and is presently being applied as a remediation technique. Stable carbon isotopic analysis, an effective and powerful tool for the investigation and monitoring of contaminant remediation, was used to characterize the isotopic effects of reductive dechlorination of PCE and TCE by vitamin B12 in laboratory microcosms. In laboratory experiments, 10 mg/L vitamin B12 degraded >90% of the initial 20 mg/L PCE with TCE, the primary product of PCE degradation, accounting for between 64% and 72% of the PCE degraded. In experiments with TCE, 147 mg/L vitamin B12 degraded >90% of the initial 20 mg/L TCE with cis ‐dichloroethene ( c DCE), the primary product of degradation accounting for between 30% and 35% of the TCE degraded. Degradation of both PCE and TCE exhibited first‐order kinetics. Strong isotopic fractionation of the reactant PCE and of the reactant TCE was observed over the course of degradation. This fractionation could be described with a Rayleigh model using enrichment factors of −16.5%o and −15.8%o for PCE, and −17.2%o and −16.6%o for TCE. Fractionation was similar in all experiments, with a mean enrichment factor of −16.5%o ± 0.6%o. The occurrence of such large enrichment factors indicates that isotopic analysis can be used to monitor the dechlorination of PCE and TCE by vitamin B12 and remediation of ground water plumes. Evidence indicates that isotopic fractionation is taking place during complexation of the chlorinated ethenes to vitamin B12, as has been suggested for reductive dechlorination by zero valent iron. The differences between e values for this reaction and those observed for anaerobic biodegradation of the chlorinated ethenes suggest that there may be differences in the rate‐determining step for these two processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".