MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Stress Induced Martensitic Transformation Studied by Neutron Diffraction

2002· article· en· W1988737666 on OpenAlexaff
E.C. Oliver, Mark R. Daymond, Philip J. Withers, T. Mori

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNeutron diffractionNeckingMartensiteAusteniteDiffusionless transformationTexture (cosmology)Stress (linguistics)PlasticityComposite materialDiffractionCrystallographyMetallurgyMicrostructureOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutron diffraction is an ideal tool for the study of stress induced martensitic transformation. The method is well established for the measurement of internal stress in two phase materials, since its selectivity allows the partitioning of stress between phases and grain families to be determined. A material undergoing a stress induced phase transformation is an example of a two phase material in which the volume fractions vary during the loading history; as such, internal stress plays a crucial role in its mechanical behaviour. In addition to the determination of internal stress, the neutron method gives information on the evolving texture of the material, and thus the preferred martensite variants which develop under loading. Moreover, by Rietveld refinement of the diffraction spectra, phase volume fractions may be determined. This paper presents results and analysis of neutron diffraction studies into stress induced martensitic transformation. In Fe-Ni-C TRIP (TRansformation Induced Plasticity) steel, the development of internal stress under uniaxial tensile loading reveals the reinforcing role of the growing martensite phase. The observed load transfer contributes to the strain hardening of the material, suppressing strain localisation and preventing necking. This identifies the role of internal stress in the origin of TRIP. Moreover, the evolution of texture shows that austenite grains with parallel to the tensile axis transform preferentially. The data is interpreted using a model based on infinitesimal deformation theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of SteelsFrench-language works237,207