Quantitative Elemental Analysis for Rhodium and Palladium in Minerals by Time-of-Flight Resonance Ionization Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Results are presented for the trace analysis of Pd and Rh by time-of-flight-resonance ionization mass spectrometry (TOF-RIMS). The spectrometer, developed at the Advanced Mineral Technology Laboratory (Ontario, Canada), is based on a commercial laser-induced mass analyzer with upgrades that include independent laser ablation and ionization sources and pulsed ion optics to minimize noise caused by primary ion formation. The schemes presented for Rh and particularly for Pd detection are simpler than others reported in the literature. The experimental laser fluences were found to be in reasonable agreement with theoretical estimates. The TOF-RIMS measurements were quantified on the basis of calibration curves derived using reference samples covering 3 orders of magnitude in concentration. Minimum detection limits of ~15 parts per billion were found for both metals, with a precision of ~ +/-15%. Samples from sulfide, iron oxide, and silicate minerals were also examined. The results are in excellent agreement with those obtained using dynamics secondary ion mass spectrometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".