O-Acetylation of Peptidoglycan in Gram-negative Bacteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ape2 gene encoding a hypothetical O-acetylpeptidoglycan esterase was amplified from genomic DNA of Neisseria gonorrhoeae FA1090 and cloned to encode either the full-length protein or a truncated version lacking its hypothetical signal sequence. Expression trials revealed that production of the full-length version possessing either an N-terminal or C-terminal His(6) tag was toxic to Escherichia coli transformants and that the host rapidly degraded the small amount of protein that was produced. An N-terminally truncated protein could be produced in sufficient yields for purification only if it possessed an N-terminal His(6) tag. This form of the protein was isolated and purified to apparent homogeneity, and its enzymatic properties were characterized. Whereas the protein could bind to insoluble peptidoglycan, it did not function as an esterase. Phenotypic characterization of E. coli transformants producing various forms of the protein revealed that it functions instead to O-acetylate peptidoglycan within the periplasm, and it was thus renamed peptidoglycan O-acetyltransferase B. This activity was found to be dependent upon a second protein, which functions to translocate acetate from the cytoplasm to the periplasm, demonstrating that the O-acetylation of peptidoglycan in N. gonorrhoeae, and other gram-negative bacteria, requires a two component system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".