MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988848270 · doi:10.1186/1471-2210-7-s1-p42

The formation of a Ca2+-dependent complex of C-reactive protein and very low density lipoprotein causes the biphasic transmittance waveform

2007· article· en· W1988848270 on OpenAlexaff
Michael E. Nesheim, John A. Samis, John B. Walker, Timothy Fischer, Liliana Tejidor, Greg Jones, Wim P. M. Houdijk, Alan R. Giles, Lev Becker, Marlys L. Koschinsky, Richard Wenstone, Colin Downey, Cheng Hock Toh

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pharmacology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformMedicinePharmacologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiophysicsComputer scienceBiologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical background The biphasic transmittance waveform (BTW) refers to a time-dependent decrease in light transmittance that often occurs prior to clotting when performing the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assay with plasmas of critically ill patients on the MDA® coagulation analyzer [1]. Early observations showed an association of the BTW with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and clinical outcome. (See Table 1) The magnitude of the BTW was assessed against in-patient mortality. A total of 346 patients were found to have a BTW on admission to the ITU with a mortality rate of 44%, as compared with 26% for those with normal waveforms. A stepwise increase in the likelihood of mortality was directly correlated with the from 3rd International Conference on cGMP Generators, Effectors and Therapeutic Implications Dresden, Germany. 15–17 June 2007

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PharmacologySame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207