MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1988883240 · doi:10.1142/s0217979200003939

THE CASE AGAINST CUPRATE-PLANE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY

2000· article· en· W1988883240 on OpenAlex
John D. Dow, Howard A. Blackstead, Dale R. Harshman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics B · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchTRIUMFU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsSuperconductivityCuprateCondensed matter physicsMaterials scienceLattice constantElectrical resistivity and conductivityCrystallographyPhysicsChemistryDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significant elements in the case for high-temperature superconductivity originating in the charge-reservoir layers are presented, including: (i) the successful predictions that PrBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 , Gd 1.6 Ce 0.4 Sr 2 Cu 2 TiO 10 , Pr 1.5 Ce 0.5 Sr 2 Cu 2 NbO 10 , and Eu 1.5 Ce 0.5 Sr 2 Cu 2 TiO 10 all superconduct; (ii) the fact that muons stopped in the SrO layers of Sr 2 YRu 1-u Cu u O 6 detected flux expulsion, (iii) the observed superconductivity of PrBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 when its c-axis lattice constant is longer than 11.77 Å, and (iv) the failure of Gd 2-z Ce z CuO 4 , Cm 2-z Th z CuO 4 , and Ba 2 GdRu 1-u Cu u O 6 to superconduct.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it